neighbor: Fix locking order for gc_list changes
Lock checker noted an inverted lock order between neigh_change_state
(neighbor lock then table lock) and neigh_periodic_work (table lock and
then neighbor lock) resulting in:
[ 121.057652] ======================================================
[ 121.058740] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 121.059861] 4.20.0-rc6+ #43 Not tainted
[ 121.060546] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 121.061630] kworker/0:2/65 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 121.062519] (____ptrval____) (&n->lock){++--}, at: neigh_periodic_work+0x237/0x324
[ 121.063894]
[ 121.063894] but task is already holding lock:
[ 121.064920] (____ptrval____) (&tbl->lock){+.-.}, at: neigh_periodic_work+0x194/0x324
[ 121.066274]
[ 121.066274] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 121.066274]
[ 121.067693]
[ 121.067693] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
...
Fix by renaming neigh_change_state to neigh_update_gc_list, changing
it to only manage whether an entry should be on the gc_list and taking
locks in the same order as neigh_periodic_work. Invoke at the end of
neigh_update only if diff between old or new states has the PERMANENT
flag set.
Fixes: 8cc196d6ef
("neighbor: gc_list changes should be protected by table lock")
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
aeb3fecde8
commit
9c29a2f55e
|
@ -127,30 +127,30 @@ static void neigh_mark_dead(struct neighbour *n)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void neigh_change_state(struct neighbour *n, u8 new)
|
||||
static void neigh_update_gc_list(struct neighbour *n)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool on_gc_list = !list_empty(&n->gc_list);
|
||||
bool new_is_perm = new & NUD_PERMANENT;
|
||||
bool on_gc_list, new_is_perm;
|
||||
|
||||
n->nud_state = new;
|
||||
write_lock_bh(&n->tbl->lock);
|
||||
write_lock(&n->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* remove from the gc list if new state is permanent;
|
||||
* add to the gc list if new state is not permanent
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (new_is_perm && on_gc_list) {
|
||||
write_lock_bh(&n->tbl->lock);
|
||||
list_del_init(&n->gc_list);
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&n->tbl->lock);
|
||||
new_is_perm = n->nud_state & NUD_PERMANENT;
|
||||
on_gc_list = !list_empty(&n->gc_list);
|
||||
|
||||
if (new_is_perm && on_gc_list) {
|
||||
list_del_init(&n->gc_list);
|
||||
atomic_dec(&n->tbl->gc_entries);
|
||||
} else if (!new_is_perm && !on_gc_list) {
|
||||
/* add entries to the tail; cleaning removes from the front */
|
||||
write_lock_bh(&n->tbl->lock);
|
||||
list_add_tail(&n->gc_list, &n->tbl->gc_list);
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&n->tbl->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
atomic_inc(&n->tbl->gc_entries);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
write_unlock(&n->lock);
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&n->tbl->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool neigh_del(struct neighbour *n, __u8 state, __u8 flags,
|
||||
|
@ -1220,7 +1220,7 @@ static int __neigh_update(struct neighbour *neigh, const u8 *lladdr,
|
|||
neigh_del_timer(neigh);
|
||||
if (old & NUD_CONNECTED)
|
||||
neigh_suspect(neigh);
|
||||
neigh_change_state(neigh, new);
|
||||
neigh->nud_state = new;
|
||||
err = 0;
|
||||
notify = old & NUD_VALID;
|
||||
if ((old & (NUD_INCOMPLETE | NUD_PROBE)) &&
|
||||
|
@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ static int __neigh_update(struct neighbour *neigh, const u8 *lladdr,
|
|||
((new & NUD_REACHABLE) ?
|
||||
neigh->parms->reachable_time :
|
||||
0)));
|
||||
neigh_change_state(neigh, new);
|
||||
neigh->nud_state = new;
|
||||
notify = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1360,6 +1360,9 @@ out:
|
|||
neigh_update_is_router(neigh, flags, ¬ify);
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if ((new ^ old) & NUD_PERMANENT)
|
||||
neigh_update_gc_list(neigh);
|
||||
|
||||
if (notify)
|
||||
neigh_update_notify(neigh, nlmsg_pid);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue