bnx2x: change smp_mb() comment to conform the true
Access to fp->tx_bp_prod is protected by __netif_tx_lock, smp_mb() is not needed for that. Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0efc22f3af
commit
9baddeb8c6
|
@ -11428,9 +11428,12 @@ static netdev_tx_t bnx2x_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
|
|||
|
||||
if (unlikely(bnx2x_tx_avail(fp) < MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 3)) {
|
||||
netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
|
||||
/* We want bnx2x_tx_int to "see" the updated tx_bd_prod
|
||||
if we put Tx into XOFF state. */
|
||||
|
||||
/* paired memory barrier is in bnx2x_tx_int(), we have to keep
|
||||
* ordering of set_bit() in netif_tx_stop_queue() and read of
|
||||
* fp->bd_tx_cons */
|
||||
smp_mb();
|
||||
|
||||
fp->eth_q_stats.driver_xoff++;
|
||||
if (bnx2x_tx_avail(fp) >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 3)
|
||||
netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue