s390/cio: Remove vfio-ccw checks of command codes
If the CCW being processed is a No-Operation, then by definition no data is being transferred. Let's fold those checks into the normal CCW processors, rather than skipping out early. Likewise, if the CCW being processed is a "test" (a category defined here as an opcode that contains zero in the lowest four bits) then no special processing is necessary as far as vfio-ccw is concerned. These command codes have not been valid since the S/370 days, meaning they are invalid in the same way as one that ends in an eight [1] or an otherwise valid command code that is undefined for the device type in question. Considering that, let's just process "test" CCWs like any other CCW, and send everything to the hardware. [1] POPS states that a x08 is a TIC CCW, and that having any high-order bits enabled is invalid for format-1 CCWs. For format-0 CCWs, the high-order bits are ignored. Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20190516161403.79053-4-farman@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
453eac3124
commit
9b6e57e5a5
|
@ -295,8 +295,6 @@ static long copy_ccw_from_iova(struct channel_program *cp,
|
|||
#define ccw_is_read_backward(_ccw) (((_ccw)->cmd_code & 0x0F) == 0x0C)
|
||||
#define ccw_is_sense(_ccw) (((_ccw)->cmd_code & 0x0F) == CCW_CMD_BASIC_SENSE)
|
||||
|
||||
#define ccw_is_test(_ccw) (((_ccw)->cmd_code & 0x0F) == 0)
|
||||
|
||||
#define ccw_is_noop(_ccw) ((_ccw)->cmd_code == CCW_CMD_NOOP)
|
||||
|
||||
#define ccw_is_tic(_ccw) ((_ccw)->cmd_code == CCW_CMD_TIC)
|
||||
|
@ -320,6 +318,10 @@ static inline int ccw_does_data_transfer(struct ccw1 *ccw)
|
|||
if (ccw->count == 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the command is a NOP, then no data will be transferred */
|
||||
if (ccw_is_noop(ccw))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the skip flag is off, then data will be transferred */
|
||||
if (!ccw_is_skip(ccw))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
@ -404,7 +406,7 @@ static void ccwchain_cda_free(struct ccwchain *chain, int idx)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct ccw1 *ccw = chain->ch_ccw + idx;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ccw_is_test(ccw) || ccw_is_noop(ccw) || ccw_is_tic(ccw))
|
||||
if (ccw_is_tic(ccw))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
kfree((void *)(u64)ccw->cda);
|
||||
|
@ -730,9 +732,6 @@ static int ccwchain_fetch_one(struct ccwchain *chain,
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct ccw1 *ccw = chain->ch_ccw + idx;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ccw_is_test(ccw) || ccw_is_noop(ccw))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ccw_is_tic(ccw))
|
||||
return ccwchain_fetch_tic(chain, idx, cp);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue