cifs: we do not need a spinlock around the tree access during umount
Remove the spinlock around the tree traversal as we are calling possibly sleeping functions. We do not need a spinlock here as there will be no modifications to this tree at this point. This prevents warnings like this to occur in dmesg: [ 653.774996] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/loc\ king/mutex.c:280 [ 653.775088] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1827, nam\ e: umount [ 653.775152] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 [ 653.775191] CPU: 0 PID: 1827 Comm: umount Tainted: G W OE 5.17.0\ -rc7-00006-g4eb628dd74df #135 [ 653.775195] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-\ 1.fc33 04/01/2014 [ 653.775197] Call Trace: [ 653.775199] <TASK> [ 653.775202] dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 [ 653.775209] __might_resched.cold+0x13f/0x172 [ 653.775213] mutex_lock+0x75/0xf0 [ 653.775217] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10 [ 653.775220] ? _raw_write_lock_irq+0xd0/0xd0 [ 653.775224] ? dput+0x6b/0x360 [ 653.775228] cifs_kill_sb+0xff/0x1d0 [cifs] [ 653.775285] deactivate_locked_super+0x85/0x130 [ 653.775289] cleanup_mnt+0x32c/0x4d0 [ 653.775292] ? path_umount+0x228/0x380 [ 653.775296] task_work_run+0xd8/0x180 [ 653.775301] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x152/0x160 [ 653.775306] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x89/0xd0 [ 653.775315] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12/0x30 [ 653.775322] do_syscall_64+0x48/0x90 [ 653.775326] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Fixes: 187af6e98b44e5d8f25e1d41a92db138eb54416f ("cifs: fix handlecache and multiuser") Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
06a466565d
commit
9a14b65d59
|
@ -269,7 +269,6 @@ static void cifs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
|
|||
dput(cifs_sb->root);
|
||||
cifs_sb->root = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_lock(&cifs_sb->tlink_tree_lock);
|
||||
node = rb_first(root);
|
||||
while (node != NULL) {
|
||||
tlink = rb_entry(node, struct tcon_link, tl_rbnode);
|
||||
|
@ -283,7 +282,6 @@ static void cifs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
|
|||
mutex_unlock(&cfid->fid_mutex);
|
||||
node = rb_next(node);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&cifs_sb->tlink_tree_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
kill_anon_super(sb);
|
||||
cifs_umount(cifs_sb);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue