drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Avoid invalid rates

Based on work by Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>, and
Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>.

Let's read the SUPPORTED_LINK_RATES and/or MAX_LINK_RATE (depending on
the eDP version of the sink) to figure out what eDP rates are
supported and pick the ideal one.

NOTE: I have only personally tested this code on eDP panels that are
1.3 or older.  Code reading SUPPORTED_LINK_RATES for DP 1.4+ was
tested by hacking the code to pretend that a table was there.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191218143416.v3.9.Ib59207b66db377380d13748752d6fce5596462c5@changeid
This commit is contained in:
Douglas Anderson 2019-12-18 14:35:30 -08:00 committed by Neil Armstrong
parent c2e1ea320d
commit 997bac693a
1 changed files with 75 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@ -475,39 +475,85 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
return i;
}
static int ti_sn_bridge_get_max_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
static void ti_sn_bridge_read_valid_rates(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata,
bool rate_valid[])
{
u8 data;
unsigned int rate_per_200khz;
unsigned int rate_mhz;
u8 dpcd_val;
int ret;
int i, j;
ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&pdata->aux, DP_MAX_LINK_RATE, &data);
ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&pdata->aux, DP_EDP_DPCD_REV, &dpcd_val);
if (ret != 1) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(pdata->dev,
"Can't read eDP rev (%d), assuming 1.1\n", ret);
dpcd_val = DP_EDP_11;
}
if (dpcd_val >= DP_EDP_14) {
/* eDP 1.4 devices must provide a custom table */
__le16 sink_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&pdata->aux, DP_SUPPORTED_LINK_RATES,
sink_rates, sizeof(sink_rates));
if (ret != sizeof(sink_rates)) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(pdata->dev,
"Can't read supported rate table (%d)\n", ret);
/* By zeroing we'll fall back to DP_MAX_LINK_RATE. */
memset(sink_rates, 0, sizeof(sink_rates));
}
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sink_rates); i++) {
rate_per_200khz = le16_to_cpu(sink_rates[i]);
if (!rate_per_200khz)
break;
rate_mhz = rate_per_200khz * 200 / 1000;
for (j = 0;
j < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut);
j++) {
if (ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[j] == rate_mhz)
rate_valid[j] = true;
}
}
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut); i++) {
if (rate_valid[i])
return;
}
DRM_DEV_ERROR(pdata->dev,
"No matching eDP rates in table; falling back\n");
}
/* On older versions best we can do is use DP_MAX_LINK_RATE */
ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&pdata->aux, DP_MAX_LINK_RATE, &dpcd_val);
if (ret != 1) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(pdata->dev,
"Can't read max rate (%d); assuming 5.4 GHz\n",
ret);
return ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1;
dpcd_val = DP_LINK_BW_5_4;
}
/*
* Return an index into ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut. Just hardcode
* these indicies since it's not like the register spec is ever going
* to change and a loop would just be more complicated. Apparently
* the DP sink can only return these few rates as supported even
* though the bridge allows some rates in between.
*/
switch (data) {
case DP_LINK_BW_1_62:
return 1;
case DP_LINK_BW_2_7:
return 4;
switch (dpcd_val) {
default:
DRM_DEV_ERROR(pdata->dev,
"Unexpected max rate (%#x); assuming 5.4 GHz\n",
(int)dpcd_val);
/* fall through */
case DP_LINK_BW_5_4:
return 7;
rate_valid[7] = 1;
/* fall through */
case DP_LINK_BW_2_7:
rate_valid[4] = 1;
/* fall through */
case DP_LINK_BW_1_62:
rate_valid[1] = 1;
break;
}
DRM_DEV_ERROR(pdata->dev,
"Unexpected max data rate (%#x); assuming 5.4 GHz\n",
(int)data);
return ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1;
}
static void ti_sn_bridge_set_video_timings(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
@ -609,9 +655,9 @@ exit:
static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
{
struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
bool rate_valid[ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut)] = { };
const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
int dp_rate_idx;
int max_dp_rate_idx;
unsigned int val;
int ret = -EINVAL;
@ -655,11 +701,15 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_SSC_CONFIG_REG, DP_NUM_LANES_MASK,
val);
ti_sn_bridge_read_valid_rates(pdata, rate_valid);
/* Train until we run out of rates */
max_dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_get_max_dp_rate_idx(pdata);
for (dp_rate_idx = ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(pdata);
dp_rate_idx <= max_dp_rate_idx;
dp_rate_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut);
dp_rate_idx++) {
if (!rate_valid[dp_rate_idx])
continue;
ret = ti_sn_link_training(pdata, dp_rate_idx, &last_err_str);
if (!ret)
break;