x86-32/irq: Don't switch to irq stack for a user-mode irq
If the irq happens in user mode, our kernel stack is empty (apart from the pt_regs themselves, of course), so there's no need or advantage to switch. And it really doesn't save any stack space, quite the reverse: it means that a nested interrupt cannot switch irq stacks. So instead of saving kernel stack space, it actually causes the potential for *more* stack usage. Also simplify the preemption count copy when we do switch stacks: just copy the whole preemption count, rather than just the softirq parts of it. There is no advantage to the partial copy: it is more effort to get a less correct result. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.2.02.1202191139260.10000@i5.linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b01543dfe6
commit
986cb48c5a
|
@ -100,13 +100,8 @@ execute_on_irq_stack(int overflow, struct irq_desc *desc, int irq)
|
|||
irqctx->tinfo.task = curctx->tinfo.task;
|
||||
irqctx->tinfo.previous_esp = current_stack_pointer;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copy the softirq bits in preempt_count so that the
|
||||
* softirq checks work in the hardirq context.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
irqctx->tinfo.preempt_count =
|
||||
(irqctx->tinfo.preempt_count & ~SOFTIRQ_MASK) |
|
||||
(curctx->tinfo.preempt_count & SOFTIRQ_MASK);
|
||||
/* Copy the preempt_count so that the [soft]irq checks work. */
|
||||
irqctx->tinfo.preempt_count = curctx->tinfo.preempt_count;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(overflow))
|
||||
call_on_stack(print_stack_overflow, isp);
|
||||
|
@ -196,7 +191,7 @@ bool handle_irq(unsigned irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
|
|||
if (unlikely(!desc))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!execute_on_irq_stack(overflow, desc, irq)) {
|
||||
if (user_mode_vm(regs) || !execute_on_irq_stack(overflow, desc, irq)) {
|
||||
if (unlikely(overflow))
|
||||
print_stack_overflow();
|
||||
desc->handle_irq(irq, desc);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue