drm/i915: Fix GCC 4.4 build issue with __intel_wait_for_register_fw
Move the BUILD_BUG_ONs for busy-wait duration outside the
_wait_for_atomic macro as discussed on the mailing list.
v2: Simplify the macro by omitting the ret__ local. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Fixes: 1d1a9774e4
("drm/i915: Extend intel_wait_for_register_fw() with fast timeout")
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170418105211.7089-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
3396a27385
commit
939cf46c3a
|
@ -88,7 +88,6 @@
|
|||
int cpu, ret, timeout = (US) * 1000; \
|
||||
u64 base; \
|
||||
_WAIT_FOR_ATOMIC_CHECK(ATOMIC); \
|
||||
BUILD_BUG_ON((US) > 50000); \
|
||||
if (!(ATOMIC)) { \
|
||||
preempt_disable(); \
|
||||
cpu = smp_processor_id(); \
|
||||
|
@ -130,8 +129,14 @@
|
|||
ret__; \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
#define wait_for_atomic(COND, MS) _wait_for_atomic((COND), (MS) * 1000, 1)
|
||||
#define wait_for_atomic_us(COND, US) _wait_for_atomic((COND), (US), 1)
|
||||
#define wait_for_atomic_us(COND, US) \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(US)); \
|
||||
BUILD_BUG_ON((US) > 50000); \
|
||||
_wait_for_atomic((COND), (US), 1); \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
#define wait_for_atomic(COND, MS) wait_for_atomic_us((COND), (MS) * 1000)
|
||||
|
||||
#define KHz(x) (1000 * (x))
|
||||
#define MHz(x) KHz(1000 * (x))
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue