Input: xen-kbdfront - mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through" part at the beginning of the code comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114757 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
03bf67817e
commit
9023705192
|
@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static void xenkbd_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
|
||||||
case XenbusStateClosed:
|
case XenbusStateClosed:
|
||||||
if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
|
if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
/* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */
|
/* fall through - Missed the backend's CLOSING state */
|
||||||
case XenbusStateClosing:
|
case XenbusStateClosing:
|
||||||
xenbus_frontend_closed(dev);
|
xenbus_frontend_closed(dev);
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue