drm/i915: Protect request peeking with RCU
Since the execlists_active() is no longer protected by the engine->active.lock, we need to protect the request pointer with RCU to prevent it being freed as we evaluate whether or not we need to preempt. Fixes:df40306902
("drm/i915/execlists: Lift process_csb() out of the irq-off spinlock") Fixes:13ed13a4dc
("drm/i915: Don't set queue_priority_hint if we don't kick the submission") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191104090158.2959-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit7d14863525
) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8a86b00a43
commit
8eb4704b12
|
@ -202,21 +202,26 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
|
|||
if (prio <= engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Nothing currently active? We're overdue for a submission! */
|
||||
inflight = execlists_active(&engine->execlists);
|
||||
if (!inflight)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are already the currently executing context, don't
|
||||
* bother evaluating if we should preempt ourselves.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (inflight->hw_context == rq->hw_context)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
|
||||
if (need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight)))
|
||||
tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
|
||||
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue