net: Unpublish sk from sk_reuseport_cb before call_rcu
The "reuse->sock[]" array is shared by multiple sockets. The going away
sk must unpublish itself from "reuse->sock[]" before making call_rcu()
call. However, this unpublish-action is currently done after a grace
period and it may cause use-after-free.
The fix is to move reuseport_detach_sock() to sk_destruct().
Due to the above reason, any socket with sk_reuseport_cb has
to go through the rcu grace period before freeing it.
It is a rather old bug (~3 yrs). The Fixes tag is not necessary
the right commit but it is the one that introduced the SOCK_RCU_FREE
logic and this fix is depending on it.
Fixes: a4298e4522
("net: add SOCK_RCU_FREE socket flag")
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0e141f757b
commit
8c7138b33e
|
@ -1700,8 +1700,6 @@ static void __sk_destruct(struct rcu_head *head)
|
||||||
sk_filter_uncharge(sk, filter);
|
sk_filter_uncharge(sk, filter);
|
||||||
RCU_INIT_POINTER(sk->sk_filter, NULL);
|
RCU_INIT_POINTER(sk->sk_filter, NULL);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb))
|
|
||||||
reuseport_detach_sock(sk);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
sock_disable_timestamp(sk, SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP);
|
sock_disable_timestamp(sk, SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -1728,7 +1726,14 @@ static void __sk_destruct(struct rcu_head *head)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
void sk_destruct(struct sock *sk)
|
void sk_destruct(struct sock *sk)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE))
|
bool use_call_rcu = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb)) {
|
||||||
|
reuseport_detach_sock(sk);
|
||||||
|
use_call_rcu = true;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (use_call_rcu)
|
||||||
call_rcu(&sk->sk_rcu, __sk_destruct);
|
call_rcu(&sk->sk_rcu, __sk_destruct);
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
__sk_destruct(&sk->sk_rcu);
|
__sk_destruct(&sk->sk_rcu);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue