drm/i915/display: Add comment to a function that probably can be removed
This function is only called from port sync and it is identical to what will be executed again in intel_update_crtc() over port sync pipes. If it is really necessary at least it deserves a better name and a comment, leaving it to people working on port sync. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191223010654.67037-7-jose.souza@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
080d47bfae
commit
8c4bba5ae2
|
@ -14737,6 +14737,10 @@ static void intel_set_dp_tp_ctl_normal(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
|
|||
intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* TODO: This is only called from port sync and it is identical to what will be
|
||||
* executed again in intel_update_crtc() over port sync pipes
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void intel_post_crtc_enable_updates(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
|
||||
struct intel_atomic_state *state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue