mtd: spi-nor: atmel: fix unlock_all() for AT25FS010/040
These flashes have some weird BP bits mapping which aren't supported in
the current locking code. Just add a simple unlock op to unprotect the
entire flash array which is needed for legacy behavior.
Fixes: 3e0930f109
("mtd: spi-nor: Rework the disabling of block write protection")
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203162959.29589-7-michael@walle.cc
This commit is contained in:
parent
afcf93e9d6
commit
8c174d1511
|
@ -8,10 +8,59 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#include "core.h"
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The Atmel AT25FS010/AT25FS040 parts have some weird configuration for the
|
||||
* block protection bits. We don't support them. But legacy behavior in linux
|
||||
* is to unlock the whole flash array on startup. Therefore, we have to support
|
||||
* exactly this operation.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int atmel_at25fs_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int atmel_at25fs_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* We only support unlocking the whole flash array */
|
||||
if (ofs || len != nor->params->size)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Write 0x00 to the status register to disable write protection */
|
||||
ret = spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(nor, 0);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
dev_dbg(nor->dev, "unable to clear BP bits, WP# asserted?\n");
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int atmel_at25fs_is_locked(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct spi_nor_locking_ops atmel_at25fs_locking_ops = {
|
||||
.lock = atmel_at25fs_lock,
|
||||
.unlock = atmel_at25fs_unlock,
|
||||
.is_locked = atmel_at25fs_is_locked,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static void atmel_at25fs_default_init(struct spi_nor *nor)
|
||||
{
|
||||
nor->params->locking_ops = &atmel_at25fs_locking_ops;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct spi_nor_fixups atmel_at25fs_fixups = {
|
||||
.default_init = atmel_at25fs_default_init,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct flash_info atmel_parts[] = {
|
||||
/* Atmel -- some are (confusingly) marketed as "DataFlash" */
|
||||
{ "at25fs010", INFO(0x1f6601, 0, 32 * 1024, 4, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) },
|
||||
{ "at25fs040", INFO(0x1f6604, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) },
|
||||
{ "at25fs010", INFO(0x1f6601, 0, 32 * 1024, 4, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK)
|
||||
.fixups = &atmel_at25fs_fixups },
|
||||
{ "at25fs040", INFO(0x1f6604, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK)
|
||||
.fixups = &atmel_at25fs_fixups },
|
||||
|
||||
{ "at25df041a", INFO(0x1f4401, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) },
|
||||
{ "at25df321", INFO(0x1f4700, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) },
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ static int spi_nor_write_16bit_cr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 cr)
|
|||
*
|
||||
* Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr1)
|
||||
int spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_16BIT_SR)
|
||||
return spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check(nor, sr1);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ void spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(struct spi_nor *nor);
|
|||
int spi_nor_sr1_bit6_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor);
|
||||
int spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor);
|
||||
int spi_nor_sr2_bit7_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor);
|
||||
int spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr1);
|
||||
|
||||
int spi_nor_xread_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr);
|
||||
ssize_t spi_nor_read_data(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from, size_t len,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue