From 8ac71d1db1f8ebc68540cda131492927f46f334c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:43:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip request serialisation if the timeline is already complete If the last request on the timeline is already complete, we do not need to emit the serialisation barriers. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207084350.3929-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 14 +++++++++----- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c index 8efa9e7a9e46..e5f87629e718 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c @@ -993,7 +993,8 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches) lockdep_assert_held(&request->i915->drm.struct_mutex); trace_i915_gem_request_add(request); - /* Make sure that no request gazumped us - if it was allocated after + /* + * Make sure that no request gazumped us - if it was allocated after * our i915_gem_request_alloc() and called __i915_add_request() before * us, the timeline will hold its seqno which is later than ours. */ @@ -1020,7 +1021,8 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches) WARN(err, "engine->emit_flush() failed: %d!\n", err); } - /* Record the position of the start of the breadcrumb so that + /* + * Record the position of the start of the breadcrumb so that * should we detect the updated seqno part-way through the * GPU processing the request, we never over-estimate the * position of the ring's HEAD. @@ -1029,7 +1031,8 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches) GEM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(cs)); request->postfix = intel_ring_offset(request, cs); - /* Seal the request and mark it as pending execution. Note that + /* + * Seal the request and mark it as pending execution. Note that * we may inspect this state, without holding any locks, during * hangcheck. Hence we apply the barrier to ensure that we do not * see a more recent value in the hws than we are tracking. @@ -1037,7 +1040,7 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches) prev = i915_gem_active_raw(&timeline->last_request, &request->i915->drm.struct_mutex); - if (prev) { + if (prev && !i915_gem_request_completed(prev)) { i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(&request->submit, &prev->submit, &request->submitq); if (engine->schedule) @@ -1057,7 +1060,8 @@ void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool flush_caches) list_add_tail(&request->ring_link, &ring->request_list); request->emitted_jiffies = jiffies; - /* Let the backend know a new request has arrived that may need + /* + * Let the backend know a new request has arrived that may need * to adjust the existing execution schedule due to a high priority * request - i.e. we may want to preempt the current request in order * to run a high priority dependency chain *before* we can execute this