drm/i915/gvt: Update time slice more frequently

When there is only one vGPU in GVT-g and it submits workloads
continuously, it will not be scheduled out, vgpu_update_timeslice
is not called and its sched_in_time is not updated in a long time,
which can be several seconds or longer.
Once GVT-g pauses to submit workload for this vGPU due to heavy
host CPU workload, this vGPU get scheduled out and
vgpu_update_timeslice is called, its left_ts will be subtract
by a big value from sched_out_time - sched_in_time.
When GVT-g is going to submit workload for this vGPU again,
it will not be scheduled in until gvt_balance_timeslice reaches
stage 0 and reset its left_ts, which introduces several
hunderand milliseconds latency.

This patch updates time slice in every ms to update sched_in_time
timely.

v2: revise commit message
v3: use more concise expr. (Zhenyu)

Signed-off-by: Zhipeng Gong <zhipeng.gong@intel.com>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Min He <min.he@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Zhipeng Gong 2018-04-04 08:43:53 +08:00 committed by Zhi Wang
parent 292bb0d38a
commit 89babe7cf1
1 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ struct vgpu_sched_data {
bool active;
ktime_t sched_in_time;
ktime_t sched_out_time;
ktime_t sched_time;
ktime_t left_ts;
ktime_t allocated_ts;
@ -69,15 +68,19 @@ struct gvt_sched_data {
ktime_t expire_time;
};
static void vgpu_update_timeslice(struct intel_vgpu *pre_vgpu)
static void vgpu_update_timeslice(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, ktime_t cur_time)
{
ktime_t delta_ts;
struct vgpu_sched_data *vgpu_data = pre_vgpu->sched_data;
struct vgpu_sched_data *vgpu_data;
delta_ts = vgpu_data->sched_out_time - vgpu_data->sched_in_time;
if (!vgpu || vgpu == vgpu->gvt->idle_vgpu)
return;
vgpu_data->sched_time += delta_ts;
vgpu_data->left_ts -= delta_ts;
vgpu_data = vgpu->sched_data;
delta_ts = ktime_sub(cur_time, vgpu_data->sched_in_time);
vgpu_data->sched_time = ktime_add(vgpu_data->sched_time, delta_ts);
vgpu_data->left_ts = ktime_sub(vgpu_data->left_ts, delta_ts);
vgpu_data->sched_in_time = cur_time;
}
#define GVT_TS_BALANCE_PERIOD_MS 100
@ -151,11 +154,7 @@ static void try_to_schedule_next_vgpu(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
}
cur_time = ktime_get();
if (scheduler->current_vgpu) {
vgpu_data = scheduler->current_vgpu->sched_data;
vgpu_data->sched_out_time = cur_time;
vgpu_update_timeslice(scheduler->current_vgpu);
}
vgpu_update_timeslice(scheduler->current_vgpu, cur_time);
vgpu_data = scheduler->next_vgpu->sched_data;
vgpu_data->sched_in_time = cur_time;
@ -227,13 +226,13 @@ out:
void intel_gvt_schedule(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
{
struct gvt_sched_data *sched_data = gvt->scheduler.sched_data;
ktime_t cur_time;
mutex_lock(&gvt->lock);
cur_time = ktime_get();
if (test_and_clear_bit(INTEL_GVT_REQUEST_SCHED,
(void *)&gvt->service_request)) {
ktime_t cur_time = ktime_get();
if (cur_time >= sched_data->expire_time) {
gvt_balance_timeslice(sched_data);
sched_data->expire_time = ktime_add_ms(
@ -242,6 +241,7 @@ void intel_gvt_schedule(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
}
clear_bit(INTEL_GVT_REQUEST_EVENT_SCHED, (void *)&gvt->service_request);
vgpu_update_timeslice(gvt->scheduler.current_vgpu, cur_time);
tbs_sched_func(sched_data);
mutex_unlock(&gvt->lock);