regulator: core: Replace checks of have_full_constraints with a function
Simple code reorganisation so we can change the logic for deciding what full constraints are more easily. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6ce4eac1f6
commit
87b2841753
|
@ -119,6 +119,11 @@ static const char *rdev_get_name(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
|||
return "";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool have_full_constraints(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return has_full_constraints;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* of_get_regulator - get a regulator device node based on supply name
|
||||
* @dev: Device pointer for the consumer (of regulator) device
|
||||
|
@ -1340,7 +1345,7 @@ static struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id,
|
|||
* Assume that a regulator is physically present and enabled
|
||||
* even if it isn't hooked up and just provide a dummy.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (has_full_constraints && allow_dummy) {
|
||||
if (have_full_constraints() && allow_dummy) {
|
||||
pr_warn("%s supply %s not found, using dummy regulator\n",
|
||||
devname, id);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3624,7 +3629,7 @@ int regulator_suspend_finish(void)
|
|||
if (error)
|
||||
ret = error;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (!has_full_constraints)
|
||||
if (!have_full_constraints())
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
if (!ops->disable)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
@ -3822,7 +3827,7 @@ static int __init regulator_init_complete(void)
|
|||
if (!enabled)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
if (has_full_constraints) {
|
||||
if (have_full_constraints()) {
|
||||
/* We log since this may kill the system if it
|
||||
* goes wrong. */
|
||||
rdev_info(rdev, "disabling\n");
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue