From aee7af356e151494d5014f57b33460b162f181b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 22:33:12 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence of a delegation In the presence of delegations, we can no longer assume that the state->n_rdwr, state->n_rdonly, state->n_wronly reflect the open stateid share mode, and so we need to calculate the initial value for calldata->arg.fmode using the state->flags. Reported-by: James Drews Fixes: 88069f77e1ac5 (NFSv41: Fix a potential state leakage when...) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+ Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 75ae8d22f067..ff94a2f36051 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -2601,6 +2601,7 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data) struct nfs4_closedata *calldata = data; struct nfs4_state *state = calldata->state; struct inode *inode = calldata->inode; + bool is_rdonly, is_wronly, is_rdwr; int call_close = 0; dprintk("%s: begin!\n", __func__); @@ -2608,18 +2609,24 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data) goto out_wait; task->tk_msg.rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_OPEN_DOWNGRADE]; - calldata->arg.fmode = FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE; spin_lock(&state->owner->so_lock); + is_rdwr = test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags); + is_rdonly = test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags); + is_wronly = test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags); + /* Calculate the current open share mode */ + calldata->arg.fmode = 0; + if (is_rdonly || is_rdwr) + calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ; + if (is_wronly || is_rdwr) + calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE; /* Calculate the change in open mode */ if (state->n_rdwr == 0) { if (state->n_rdonly == 0) { - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags); - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags); + call_close |= is_rdonly || is_rdwr; calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_READ; } if (state->n_wronly == 0) { - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags); - call_close |= test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags); + call_close |= is_wronly || is_rdwr; calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_WRITE; } } From 412f6c4c26fb1eba8844290663837561ac53fa6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 22:09:08 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] NFSv4: Don't clear the open state when we just did an OPEN_DOWNGRADE If we did an OPEN_DOWNGRADE, then the right thing to do on success, is to apply the new open mode to the struct nfs4_state. Instead, we were unconditionally clearing the state, making it appear to our state machinery as if we had just performed a CLOSE. Fixes: 226056c5c312b (NFSv4: Use correct locking when updating nfs4_state...) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.15+ Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index ff94a2f36051..7dd8aca31c29 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -2560,6 +2560,7 @@ static void nfs4_close_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data) struct nfs4_closedata *calldata = data; struct nfs4_state *state = calldata->state; struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(calldata->inode); + nfs4_stateid *res_stateid = NULL; dprintk("%s: begin!\n", __func__); if (!nfs4_sequence_done(task, &calldata->res.seq_res)) @@ -2570,12 +2571,12 @@ static void nfs4_close_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data) */ switch (task->tk_status) { case 0: - if (calldata->roc) + res_stateid = &calldata->res.stateid; + if (calldata->arg.fmode == 0 && calldata->roc) pnfs_roc_set_barrier(state->inode, calldata->roc_barrier); - nfs_clear_open_stateid(state, &calldata->res.stateid, 0); renew_lease(server, calldata->timestamp); - goto out_release; + break; case -NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED: case -NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID: case -NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID: @@ -2589,7 +2590,7 @@ static void nfs4_close_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data) goto out_release; } } - nfs_clear_open_stateid(state, NULL, calldata->arg.fmode); + nfs_clear_open_stateid(state, res_stateid, calldata->arg.fmode); out_release: nfs_release_seqid(calldata->arg.seqid); nfs_refresh_inode(calldata->inode, calldata->res.fattr); From f87d928f6d98644d39809a013a22f981d39017cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:46:48 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] NFSv3: Fix another acl regression When creating a new object on the NFS server, we should not be sending posix setacl requests unless the preceding posix_acl_create returned a non-trivial acl. Doing so, causes Solaris servers in particular to return an EINVAL. Fixes: 013cdf1088d72 (nfs: use generic posix ACL infrastructure,,,) Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132786 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.14+ Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c b/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c index d0fec260132a..24c6898159cc 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs3acl.c @@ -129,7 +129,10 @@ static int __nfs3_proc_setacls(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, .rpc_argp = &args, .rpc_resp = &fattr, }; - int status; + int status = 0; + + if (acl == NULL && (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) || dfacl == NULL)) + goto out; status = -EOPNOTSUPP; if (!nfs_server_capable(inode, NFS_CAP_ACLS))