video: da8xx-fb: fixing timing off by one errors
The LCD controller represents some of the timing fields with a 0 in the register representing 1. This was not taken into account when these registers were being set. Interestingly enough not all of the LCDC controller timing registers implement this representation so carefully went through the technical reference manual to only "fix" the correct timings. Signed-off-by: Darren Etheridge <detheridge@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a592d9fd63
commit
83edd73a9c
|
@ -407,9 +407,9 @@ static void lcd_cfg_horizontal_sync(int back_porch, int pulse_width,
|
|||
u32 reg;
|
||||
|
||||
reg = lcdc_read(LCD_RASTER_TIMING_0_REG) & 0xf;
|
||||
reg |= ((back_porch & 0xff) << 24)
|
||||
| ((front_porch & 0xff) << 16)
|
||||
| ((pulse_width & 0x3f) << 10);
|
||||
reg |= (((back_porch-1) & 0xff) << 24)
|
||||
| (((front_porch-1) & 0xff) << 16)
|
||||
| (((pulse_width-1) & 0x3f) << 10);
|
||||
lcdc_write(reg, LCD_RASTER_TIMING_0_REG);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static void lcd_cfg_vertical_sync(int back_porch, int pulse_width,
|
|||
reg = lcdc_read(LCD_RASTER_TIMING_1_REG) & 0x3ff;
|
||||
reg |= ((back_porch & 0xff) << 24)
|
||||
| ((front_porch & 0xff) << 16)
|
||||
| ((pulse_width & 0x3f) << 10);
|
||||
| (((pulse_width-1) & 0x3f) << 10);
|
||||
lcdc_write(reg, LCD_RASTER_TIMING_1_REG);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue