efi: Reduce the amount of memblock reservations for persistent allocations
The current implementation of efi_mem_reserve_persistent() is rather naive, in the sense that for each invocation, it creates a separate linked list entry to describe the reservation. Since the linked list entries themselves need to persist across subsequent kexec reboots, every reservation created this way results in two memblock_reserve() calls at the next boot. On arm64 systems with 100s of CPUs, this may result in a excessive number of memblock reservations, and needless fragmentation. So instead, make use of the newly updated struct linux_efi_memreserve layout to put multiple reservations into a single linked list entry. This should get rid of the numerous tiny memblock reservations, and effectively cut the total number of reservations in half on arm64 systems with many CPUs. [ mingo: build warning fix. ] Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999@gmail.com> Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181129171230.18699-11-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5f0b0ecf04
commit
80424b02d4
|
@ -997,8 +997,8 @@ static int __init efi_memreserve_map_root(void)
|
|||
int __ref efi_mem_reserve_persistent(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct linux_efi_memreserve *rsv;
|
||||
int rsvsize = EFI_MEMRESERVE_SIZE(1);
|
||||
int rc;
|
||||
unsigned long prsv;
|
||||
int rc, index;
|
||||
|
||||
if (efi_memreserve_root == (void *)ULONG_MAX)
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
|
@ -1009,11 +1009,24 @@ int __ref efi_mem_reserve_persistent(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
|
|||
return rc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rsv = kmalloc(rsvsize, GFP_ATOMIC);
|
||||
/* first try to find a slot in an existing linked list entry */
|
||||
for (prsv = efi_memreserve_root->next; prsv; prsv = rsv->next) {
|
||||
rsv = __va(prsv);
|
||||
index = atomic_fetch_add_unless(&rsv->count, 1, rsv->size);
|
||||
if (index < rsv->size) {
|
||||
rsv->entry[index].base = addr;
|
||||
rsv->entry[index].size = size;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* no slot found - allocate a new linked list entry */
|
||||
rsv = (struct linux_efi_memreserve *)__get_free_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
|
||||
if (!rsv)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
rsv->size = 1;
|
||||
rsv->size = EFI_MEMRESERVE_COUNT(PAGE_SIZE);
|
||||
atomic_set(&rsv->count, 1);
|
||||
rsv->entry[0].base = addr;
|
||||
rsv->entry[0].size = size;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1724,4 +1724,7 @@ struct linux_efi_memreserve {
|
|||
#define EFI_MEMRESERVE_SIZE(count) (sizeof(struct linux_efi_memreserve) + \
|
||||
(count) * sizeof(((struct linux_efi_memreserve *)0)->entry[0]))
|
||||
|
||||
#define EFI_MEMRESERVE_COUNT(size) (((size) - sizeof(struct linux_efi_memreserve)) \
|
||||
/ sizeof(((struct linux_efi_memreserve *)0)->entry[0]))
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _LINUX_EFI_H */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue