mmc: sdhci: fix data timeout (part 2)
The calculation for the timeout based on the number of card clocks is incorrect. The calculation assumed: timeout in microseconds = clock cycles / clock in Hz which is clearly a several orders of magnitude wrong. Fix this by multiplying the clock cycles by 1000000 prior to dividing by the Hz based clock. Also, as per part 1, ensure that the division rounds up. As this needs 64-bit math via do_div(), avoid it if the clock cycles is zero. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.15+ Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fafcfda9e7
commit
7f05538af7
|
@ -636,8 +636,19 @@ static u8 sdhci_calc_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
|
|||
target_timeout = cmd->busy_timeout * 1000;
|
||||
else {
|
||||
target_timeout = DIV_ROUND_UP(data->timeout_ns, 1000);
|
||||
if (host->clock)
|
||||
target_timeout += data->timeout_clks / host->clock;
|
||||
if (host->clock && data->timeout_clks) {
|
||||
unsigned long long val;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* data->timeout_clks is in units of clock cycles.
|
||||
* host->clock is in Hz. target_timeout is in us.
|
||||
* Hence, us = 1000000 * cycles / Hz. Round up.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
val = 1000000 * data->timeout_clks;
|
||||
if (do_div(val, host->clock))
|
||||
target_timeout++;
|
||||
target_timeout += val;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue