sched: Avoid double preemption in __cond_resched_*lock*()
For PREEMPT/DYNAMIC_PREEMPT the *_unlock() will already trigger a preemption, no point in then calling preempt_schedule_common() *again*. Use _cond_resched() instead, since this is a NOP for the preemptible configs while it provide a preemption point for the others. Reported-by: xuhaifeng <xuhaifeng@oppo.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YcGnvDEYBwOiV0cR@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
This commit is contained in:
parent
a315da5e68
commit
7e406d1ff3
|
@ -8218,9 +8218,7 @@ int __cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
|
|||
|
||||
if (spin_needbreak(lock) || resched) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(lock);
|
||||
if (resched)
|
||||
preempt_schedule_common();
|
||||
else
|
||||
if (!_cond_resched())
|
||||
cpu_relax();
|
||||
ret = 1;
|
||||
spin_lock(lock);
|
||||
|
@ -8238,9 +8236,7 @@ int __cond_resched_rwlock_read(rwlock_t *lock)
|
|||
|
||||
if (rwlock_needbreak(lock) || resched) {
|
||||
read_unlock(lock);
|
||||
if (resched)
|
||||
preempt_schedule_common();
|
||||
else
|
||||
if (!_cond_resched())
|
||||
cpu_relax();
|
||||
ret = 1;
|
||||
read_lock(lock);
|
||||
|
@ -8258,9 +8254,7 @@ int __cond_resched_rwlock_write(rwlock_t *lock)
|
|||
|
||||
if (rwlock_needbreak(lock) || resched) {
|
||||
write_unlock(lock);
|
||||
if (resched)
|
||||
preempt_schedule_common();
|
||||
else
|
||||
if (!_cond_resched())
|
||||
cpu_relax();
|
||||
ret = 1;
|
||||
write_lock(lock);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue