From 7d380f24fe662033fd21a65f678057abd293f76e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bharata B Rao Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 16:27:05 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] sched/numa: Fix a few comments Fix a few comments to help understand them better. Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Mel Gorman Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211004105706.3669-4-bharata@amd.com --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index cfbd5ef0b558..87db481e8a56 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@ static void numa_migrate_preferred(struct task_struct *p) } /* - * Find out how many nodes on the workload is actively running on. Do this by + * Find out how many nodes the workload is actively running on. Do this by * tracking the nodes from which NUMA hinting faults are triggered. This can * be different from the set of nodes where the workload's memory is currently * located. @@ -2128,7 +2128,7 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p, /* * If there were no record hinting faults then either the task is - * completely idle or all activity is areas that are not of interest + * completely idle or all activity is in areas that are not of interest * to automatic numa balancing. Related to that, if there were failed * migration then it implies we are migrating too quickly or the local * node is overloaded. In either case, scan slower