drm/i915: Apply some ocd for IMR vs. IER order during irq enable
When disabling interrupts we do the writes in this order: IMR,IER,IIR,IIR. But when enabling interrupts we don't do use the mirrored order, and instead do IIR,IIR,IMR,IER. I like consistency unless there's a good reason against it, which I can't think of here, so change the enable order to IIR,IIR,IER,IMR. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
850c4cdc6c
commit
7d1bd53931
|
@ -126,16 +126,16 @@ static const u32 hpd_status_i915[] = { /* i915 and valleyview are the same */
|
|||
|
||||
#define GEN8_IRQ_INIT_NDX(type, which, imr_val, ier_val) do { \
|
||||
GEN5_ASSERT_IIR_IS_ZERO(GEN8_##type##_IIR(which)); \
|
||||
I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IMR(which), (imr_val)); \
|
||||
I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IER(which), (ier_val)); \
|
||||
POSTING_READ(GEN8_##type##_IER(which)); \
|
||||
I915_WRITE(GEN8_##type##_IMR(which), (imr_val)); \
|
||||
POSTING_READ(GEN8_##type##_IMR(which)); \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
||||
#define GEN5_IRQ_INIT(type, imr_val, ier_val) do { \
|
||||
GEN5_ASSERT_IIR_IS_ZERO(type##IIR); \
|
||||
I915_WRITE(type##IMR, (imr_val)); \
|
||||
I915_WRITE(type##IER, (ier_val)); \
|
||||
POSTING_READ(type##IER); \
|
||||
I915_WRITE(type##IMR, (imr_val)); \
|
||||
POSTING_READ(type##IMR); \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
||||
/* For display hotplug interrupt */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue