um: virtio: clean up a comment
There's no 'simtime' device, because implementing that through virtio was just too much complexity. Clean up the comment that still refers to it. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
This commit is contained in:
parent
92bf22614b
commit
74e919d230
|
@ -914,8 +914,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vu_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
|
|||
#ifdef CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* When we get an interrupt, we must bounce it through the simulation
|
||||
* calendar (the simtime device), except for the simtime device itself
|
||||
* since that's part of the simulation control.
|
||||
* calendar (the time-travel=ext:... socket).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (time_travel_mode == TT_MODE_EXTERNAL && callback) {
|
||||
info->callback = callback;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue