tty: n_tty: use time_is_before_jiffies() in n_tty_receive_overrun()
The jiffies tests in n_tty_receive_overrun() are simplified ratelimiting (without locking). We could use struct ratelimit_state and the helpers, but to me, it occurs to be too complex for this use case. But the code currently tests both if the time passed (the first time_after()) and if jiffies wrapped around (the second time_after()). time_is_before_jiffies() takes care of both, provided overrun_time is initialized at the allocation time. So switch to time_is_before_jiffies(), the same what ratelimiting does. Signed-off-by: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230827074147.2287-5-jirislaby@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
68d90d5f7b
commit
73276e3a10
|
@ -1173,8 +1173,7 @@ static void n_tty_receive_overrun(const struct tty_struct *tty)
|
|||
struct n_tty_data *ldata = tty->disc_data;
|
||||
|
||||
ldata->num_overrun++;
|
||||
if (time_after(jiffies, ldata->overrun_time + HZ) ||
|
||||
time_after(ldata->overrun_time, jiffies)) {
|
||||
if (time_is_before_jiffies(ldata->overrun_time + HZ)) {
|
||||
tty_warn(tty, "%d input overrun(s)\n", ldata->num_overrun);
|
||||
ldata->overrun_time = jiffies;
|
||||
ldata->num_overrun = 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue