btrfs: abort transaction at balance_level() when left child is missing

At balance_level() we are calling btrfs_handle_fs_error() when the middle
child only has 1 item and the left child is missing, however we can simply
use btrfs_abort_transaction(), which achieves the same purposes: to turn
the fs to error state, abort the current transaction and turn the fs to
RO mode. Besides that, btrfs_abort_transaction() also prints a stack trace
which makes it more useful.

Also, as this is a highly unexpected case and it's about a b+tree
inconsistency, change the error code from -EROFS to -EUCLEAN, tag the if
branch as 'unlikely' and log an explicit error message.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Filipe Manana 2023-06-08 11:27:44 +01:00 committed by David Sterba
parent 87b8e9d06e
commit 725026ed59
1 changed files with 7 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1164,9 +1164,13 @@ static noinline int balance_level(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
* otherwise we would have pulled some pointers from the
* right
*/
if (!left) {
ret = -EROFS;
btrfs_handle_fs_error(fs_info, ret, NULL);
if (unlikely(!left)) {
btrfs_crit(fs_info,
"missing left child when middle child only has 1 item, parent bytenr %llu level %d mid bytenr %llu root %llu",
parent->start, btrfs_header_level(parent),
mid->start, btrfs_root_id(root));
ret = -EUCLEAN;
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
goto out;
}
wret = balance_node_right(trans, mid, left);