drm/ttm: fix documentation of ttm_bo_reserve
Previously, the comment was inconsistent. EDEADLK is what the ww_mutex mechanism really returns. Signed-off-by: Nicolai Hähnle <Nicolai.Haehnle@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4e926d2db5
commit
6beb8201bb
|
@ -826,10 +826,10 @@ static inline int __ttm_bo_reserve(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
|
||||||
* reserved, the validation sequence is checked against the validation
|
* reserved, the validation sequence is checked against the validation
|
||||||
* sequence of the process currently reserving the buffer,
|
* sequence of the process currently reserving the buffer,
|
||||||
* and if the current validation sequence is greater than that of the process
|
* and if the current validation sequence is greater than that of the process
|
||||||
* holding the reservation, the function returns -EAGAIN. Otherwise it sleeps
|
* holding the reservation, the function returns -EDEADLK. Otherwise it sleeps
|
||||||
* waiting for the buffer to become unreserved, after which it retries
|
* waiting for the buffer to become unreserved, after which it retries
|
||||||
* reserving.
|
* reserving.
|
||||||
* The caller should, when receiving an -EAGAIN error
|
* The caller should, when receiving an -EDEADLK error
|
||||||
* release all its buffer reservations, wait for @bo to become unreserved, and
|
* release all its buffer reservations, wait for @bo to become unreserved, and
|
||||||
* then rerun the validation with the same validation sequence. This procedure
|
* then rerun the validation with the same validation sequence. This procedure
|
||||||
* will always guarantee that the process with the lowest validation sequence
|
* will always guarantee that the process with the lowest validation sequence
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue