locking/lockdep: Check redundant dependency only when CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL
As Peter has put it all sound and complete for the cause, I simply quote: "It (check_redundant) was added for cross-release (which has since been reverted) which would generate a lot of redundant links (IIRC) but having it makes the reports more convoluted -- basically, if we had an A-B-C relation, then A-C will not be added to the graph because it is already covered. This then means any report will include B, even though a shorter cycle might have been possible." This would increase the number of direct dependencies. For a simple workload (make clean; reboot; make vmlinux -j8), the data looks like this: CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL: direct dependencies: 6926 !CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL: direct dependencies: 9052 (+30.7%) Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-21-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8c2c2b449a
commit
68e9dc29f8
|
@ -1739,6 +1739,7 @@ check_noncircular(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target,
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check that the dependency graph starting at <src> can lead to
|
||||
* <target> or not. If it can, <src> -> <target> dependency is already
|
||||
|
@ -1768,6 +1769,7 @@ check_redundant(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target)
|
|||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2428,12 +2430,14 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Is the <prev> -> <next> link redundant?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = check_redundant(prev, next);
|
||||
if (ret != 1)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if (!trace->nr_entries && !save_trace(trace))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue