net/rose: Fix Use-After-Free in rose_ioctl
[ Upstream commit 810c38a369a0a0ce625b5c12169abce1dd9ccd53 ]
Because rose_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue
without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can
cause a race with rose_accept().
A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow.
```
rose_ioctl() -> skb_peek()
rose_accept() -> skb_dequeue() -> kfree_skb()
```
Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to rose_ioctl() to fix this issue.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3
("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@theori.io>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231209100538.GA407321@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
531fd46f92
commit
63caa51833
|
@ -1315,9 +1315,11 @@ static int rose_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
|
||||||
case TIOCINQ: {
|
case TIOCINQ: {
|
||||||
struct sk_buff *skb;
|
struct sk_buff *skb;
|
||||||
long amount = 0L;
|
long amount = 0L;
|
||||||
/* These two are safe on a single CPU system as only user tasks fiddle here */
|
|
||||||
|
spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
|
||||||
if ((skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL)
|
if ((skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL)
|
||||||
amount = skb->len;
|
amount = skb->len;
|
||||||
|
spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
|
||||||
return put_user(amount, (unsigned int __user *) argp);
|
return put_user(amount, (unsigned int __user *) argp);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue