usb: hub: allow to process more usb hub events in parallel
It seems that only choose_devnum() was not ready to process more hub events at the same time. All should be fine if we take bus->usb_address0_mutex there. It will make sure that more devnums will not be chosen for the given bus and the related devices at the same time. Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
37ebb54915
commit
638139eb95
|
@ -2045,7 +2045,8 @@ static void choose_devnum(struct usb_device *udev)
|
|||
int devnum;
|
||||
struct usb_bus *bus = udev->bus;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If hub_wq ever becomes multithreaded, this will need a lock */
|
||||
/* be safe when more hub events are proceed in parallel */
|
||||
mutex_lock(&bus->usb_address0_mutex);
|
||||
if (udev->wusb) {
|
||||
devnum = udev->portnum + 1;
|
||||
BUG_ON(test_bit(devnum, bus->devmap.devicemap));
|
||||
|
@ -2063,6 +2064,7 @@ static void choose_devnum(struct usb_device *udev)
|
|||
set_bit(devnum, bus->devmap.devicemap);
|
||||
udev->devnum = devnum;
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&bus->usb_address0_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void release_devnum(struct usb_device *udev)
|
||||
|
@ -5164,11 +5166,8 @@ int usb_hub_init(void)
|
|||
* USB-PERSIST port handover. Otherwise it might see that a full-speed
|
||||
* device was gone before the EHCI controller had handed its port
|
||||
* over to the companion full-speed controller.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Also we use ordered workqueue because the code is not ready
|
||||
* for parallel execution of hub events, see choose_devnum().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
hub_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("usb_hub_wq", WQ_FREEZABLE);
|
||||
hub_wq = alloc_workqueue("usb_hub_wq", WQ_FREEZABLE, 0);
|
||||
if (hub_wq)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue