drm/i915/gt: Use scnprintf() for avoiding potential buffer overflow
Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf(). Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200311073256.6535-1-tiwai@suse.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
3c4e93e9d9
commit
61f874d6e0
|
@ -1381,24 +1381,24 @@ static void intel_engine_print_registers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
|
|||
char hdr[160];
|
||||
int len;
|
||||
|
||||
len = snprintf(hdr, sizeof(hdr),
|
||||
"\t\tActive[%d]: ",
|
||||
(int)(port - execlists->active));
|
||||
len = scnprintf(hdr, sizeof(hdr),
|
||||
"\t\tActive[%d]: ",
|
||||
(int)(port - execlists->active));
|
||||
if (!i915_request_signaled(rq)) {
|
||||
struct intel_timeline *tl = get_timeline(rq);
|
||||
|
||||
len += snprintf(hdr + len, sizeof(hdr) - len,
|
||||
"ring:{start:%08x, hwsp:%08x, seqno:%08x, runtime:%llums}, ",
|
||||
i915_ggtt_offset(rq->ring->vma),
|
||||
tl ? tl->hwsp_offset : 0,
|
||||
hwsp_seqno(rq),
|
||||
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(intel_context_get_total_runtime_ns(rq->context),
|
||||
1000 * 1000));
|
||||
len += scnprintf(hdr + len, sizeof(hdr) - len,
|
||||
"ring:{start:%08x, hwsp:%08x, seqno:%08x, runtime:%llums}, ",
|
||||
i915_ggtt_offset(rq->ring->vma),
|
||||
tl ? tl->hwsp_offset : 0,
|
||||
hwsp_seqno(rq),
|
||||
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(intel_context_get_total_runtime_ns(rq->context),
|
||||
1000 * 1000));
|
||||
|
||||
if (tl)
|
||||
intel_timeline_put(tl);
|
||||
}
|
||||
snprintf(hdr + len, sizeof(hdr) - len, "rq: ");
|
||||
scnprintf(hdr + len, sizeof(hdr) - len, "rq: ");
|
||||
print_request(m, rq, hdr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (port = execlists->pending; (rq = *port); port++) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue