affs: Replace binary semaphores with mutexes
At a slight footprint cost (24 vs 32 bytes), mutexes are more optimal than semaphores; it's also a nicer interface for mutual exclusion, which is why they are encouraged over binary semaphores, when possible. For both i_link_lock and i_ext_lock (and hence i_hash_lock which I annotated for the hash lock mapping hackery for lockdep), their semantics imply traditional lock ownership; that is, the lock owner is the same for both lock/unlock operations and does not run in irq context. Therefore it is safe to convert. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
af42d3466b
commit
6060c07d47
|
@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ struct affs_ext_key {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
struct affs_inode_info {
|
||||
atomic_t i_opencnt;
|
||||
struct semaphore i_link_lock; /* Protects internal inode access. */
|
||||
struct semaphore i_ext_lock; /* Protects internal inode access. */
|
||||
struct mutex i_link_lock; /* Protects internal inode access. */
|
||||
struct mutex i_ext_lock; /* Protects internal inode access. */
|
||||
#define i_hash_lock i_ext_lock
|
||||
u32 i_blkcnt; /* block count */
|
||||
u32 i_extcnt; /* extended block count */
|
||||
|
@ -293,30 +293,30 @@ affs_adjust_bitmapchecksum(struct buffer_head *bh, u32 val)
|
|||
static inline void
|
||||
affs_lock_link(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
down(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_link_lock);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_link_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
static inline void
|
||||
affs_unlock_link(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
up(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_link_lock);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_link_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
static inline void
|
||||
affs_lock_dir(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
down(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_hash_lock);
|
||||
mutex_lock_nested(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_hash_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
|
||||
}
|
||||
static inline void
|
||||
affs_unlock_dir(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
up(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_hash_lock);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_hash_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
static inline void
|
||||
affs_lock_ext(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
down(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_ext_lock);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_ext_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
static inline void
|
||||
affs_unlock_ext(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
up(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_ext_lock);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&AFFS_I(inode)->i_ext_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ static void init_once(void *foo)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct affs_inode_info *ei = (struct affs_inode_info *) foo;
|
||||
|
||||
sema_init(&ei->i_link_lock, 1);
|
||||
sema_init(&ei->i_ext_lock, 1);
|
||||
mutex_init(&ei->i_link_lock);
|
||||
mutex_init(&ei->i_ext_lock);
|
||||
inode_init_once(&ei->vfs_inode);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue