workqueue: add workqueue->unbound_attrs
Currently, when exposing attrs of an unbound workqueue via sysfs, the workqueue_attrs of first_pwq() is used as that should equal the current state of the workqueue. The planned NUMA affinity support will make unbound workqueues make use of multiple pool_workqueues for different NUMA nodes and the above assumption will no longer hold. Introduce workqueue->unbound_attrs which records the current attrs in effect and use it for sysfs instead of first_pwq()->attrs. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3f90ad469
commit
6029a91829
|
@ -244,6 +244,8 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
|
|||
int nr_drainers; /* WQ: drain in progress */
|
||||
int saved_max_active; /* WQ: saved pwq max_active */
|
||||
|
||||
struct workqueue_attrs *unbound_attrs; /* WQ: only for unbound wqs */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
|
||||
struct wq_device *wq_dev; /* I: for sysfs interface */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
@ -3088,10 +3090,9 @@ static ssize_t wq_nice_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
|
|||
struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
|
||||
int written;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock_sched();
|
||||
written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n",
|
||||
first_pwq(wq)->pool->attrs->nice);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
|
||||
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
|
||||
written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", wq->unbound_attrs->nice);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
return written;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3105,9 +3106,9 @@ static struct workqueue_attrs *wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
|
|||
if (!attrs)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock_sched();
|
||||
copy_workqueue_attrs(attrs, first_pwq(wq)->pool->attrs);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
|
||||
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
|
||||
copy_workqueue_attrs(attrs, wq->unbound_attrs);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
|
||||
return attrs;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3138,10 +3139,9 @@ static ssize_t wq_cpumask_show(struct device *dev,
|
|||
struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
|
||||
int written;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock_sched();
|
||||
written = cpumask_scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE,
|
||||
first_pwq(wq)->pool->attrs->cpumask);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
|
||||
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
|
||||
written = cpumask_scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, wq->unbound_attrs->cpumask);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
written += scnprintf(buf + written, PAGE_SIZE - written, "\n");
|
||||
return written;
|
||||
|
@ -3558,8 +3558,10 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
|
|||
* If we're the last pwq going away, @wq is already dead and no one
|
||||
* is gonna access it anymore. Free it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (is_last)
|
||||
if (is_last) {
|
||||
free_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs);
|
||||
kfree(wq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -3634,6 +3636,9 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
|
|||
/* link in @pwq */
|
||||
list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
|
||||
|
||||
if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
|
||||
copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, pool->attrs);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3766,6 +3771,12 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt,
|
|||
if (!wq)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
|
||||
wq->unbound_attrs = alloc_workqueue_attrs(GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (!wq->unbound_attrs)
|
||||
goto err_free_wq;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
vsnprintf(wq->name, namelen, fmt, args1);
|
||||
va_end(args);
|
||||
va_end(args1);
|
||||
|
@ -3835,6 +3846,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt,
|
|||
return wq;
|
||||
|
||||
err_free_wq:
|
||||
free_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs);
|
||||
kfree(wq);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
err_destroy:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue