[NETROM]: Remove unessecary lock_sock calls in netrom_ioctl()
lock_sock is needed only in very few cases, so do it there instead of around the switch statement. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b461d2f218
commit
5ff7630e4a
|
@ -1166,10 +1166,11 @@ static int nr_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
|
|||
void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
lock_sock(sk);
|
||||
switch (cmd) {
|
||||
case TIOCOUTQ: {
|
||||
long amount;
|
||||
|
||||
lock_sock(sk);
|
||||
amount = sk->sk_sndbuf - atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
|
||||
if (amount < 0)
|
||||
amount = 0;
|
||||
|
@ -1180,6 +1181,8 @@ static int nr_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
|
|||
case TIOCINQ: {
|
||||
struct sk_buff *skb;
|
||||
long amount = 0L;
|
||||
|
||||
lock_sock(sk);
|
||||
/* These two are safe on a single CPU system as only user tasks fiddle here */
|
||||
if ((skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL)
|
||||
amount = skb->len;
|
||||
|
@ -1188,6 +1191,7 @@ static int nr_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
case SIOCGSTAMP:
|
||||
lock_sock(sk);
|
||||
ret = sock_get_timestamp(sk, argp);
|
||||
release_sock(sk);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
@ -1202,21 +1206,17 @@ static int nr_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
|
|||
case SIOCSIFNETMASK:
|
||||
case SIOCGIFMETRIC:
|
||||
case SIOCSIFMETRIC:
|
||||
release_sock(sk);
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
case SIOCADDRT:
|
||||
case SIOCDELRT:
|
||||
case SIOCNRDECOBS:
|
||||
release_sock(sk);
|
||||
if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) return -EPERM;
|
||||
return nr_rt_ioctl(cmd, argp);
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
release_sock(sk);
|
||||
return dev_ioctl(cmd, argp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
release_sock(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue