mm: page-writeback: kill get_writeback_state() comments
The get_writeback_state() has gone since 2006, kill related comments. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210508125026.56600-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f8af4d0892
commit
5defd497ed
|
@ -1869,10 +1869,9 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, dirty_throttle_leaks) = 0;
|
|||
* which was newly dirtied. The function will periodically check the system's
|
||||
* dirty state and will initiate writeback if needed.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* On really big machines, get_writeback_state is expensive, so try to avoid
|
||||
* calling it too often (ratelimiting). But once we're over the dirty memory
|
||||
* limit we decrease the ratelimiting by a lot, to prevent individual processes
|
||||
* from overshooting the limit by (ratelimit_pages) each.
|
||||
* Once we're over the dirty memory limit we decrease the ratelimiting
|
||||
* by a lot, to prevent individual processes from overshooting the limit
|
||||
* by (ratelimit_pages) each.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(struct address_space *mapping)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -2045,8 +2044,6 @@ void laptop_sync_completion(void)
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* If ratelimit_pages is too high then we can get into dirty-data overload
|
||||
* if a large number of processes all perform writes at the same time.
|
||||
* If it is too low then SMP machines will call the (expensive)
|
||||
* get_writeback_state too often.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Here we set ratelimit_pages to a level which ensures that when all CPUs are
|
||||
* dirtying in parallel, we cannot go more than 3% (1/32) over the dirty memory
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue