asm-generic/bitops: Update stale comment
The comment in 'asm-generic/bitops.h' states that you should "recode these in the native assembly language, if at all possible". This is pretty crappy advice now that the generic implementation is defined in terms of atomic_long_t rather than a spinlock, so update the comment and hopefully save future architecture maintainers a bit of work. Reported-by: Stefan Asserhall <stefana@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200213093927.1836-1-will@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b39f99c22
commit
5d0c9b0eb8
|
@ -4,8 +4,9 @@
|
|||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For the benefit of those who are trying to port Linux to another
|
||||
* architecture, here are some C-language equivalents. You should
|
||||
* recode these in the native assembly language, if at all possible.
|
||||
* architecture, here are some C-language equivalents. They should
|
||||
* generate reasonable code, so take a look at what your compiler spits
|
||||
* out before rolling your own buggy implementation in assembly language.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* C language equivalents written by Theodore Ts'o, 9/26/92
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue