printk: replacing the raw_spin_lock/unlock with raw_spin_lock/unlock_irq
In function devkmsg_read/writev/llseek/poll/open()..., the function raw_spin_lock/unlock is used, there is potential deadlock case happening. CPU1: thread1 doing the cat /dev/kmsg: raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock); while (user->seq == log_next_seq) { when thread1 run here, at this time one interrupt is coming on CPU1 and running based on this thread,if the interrupt handle called the printk which need the logbuf_lock spin also, it will cause deadlock. So we should use raw_spin_lock/unlock_irq here. Acked-by: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6887a4131d
commit
5c53d819c7
|
@ -430,20 +430,20 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
|
|||
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&user->lock);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
while (user->seq == log_next_seq) {
|
||||
if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
|
||||
ret = -EAGAIN;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
ret = wait_event_interruptible(log_wait,
|
||||
user->seq != log_next_seq);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (user->seq < log_first_seq) {
|
||||
|
@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
|
|||
user->idx = log_first_idx;
|
||||
user->seq = log_first_seq;
|
||||
ret = -EPIPE;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
|
|||
|
||||
user->idx = log_next(user->idx);
|
||||
user->seq++;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (len > count) {
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static loff_t devkmsg_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
|
|||
if (offset)
|
||||
return -ESPIPE;
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
switch (whence) {
|
||||
case SEEK_SET:
|
||||
/* the first record */
|
||||
|
@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static loff_t devkmsg_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
|
|||
default:
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -566,14 +566,14 @@ static unsigned int devkmsg_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
|
|||
|
||||
poll_wait(file, &log_wait, wait);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
if (user->seq < log_next_seq) {
|
||||
/* return error when data has vanished underneath us */
|
||||
if (user->seq < log_first_seq)
|
||||
ret = POLLIN|POLLRDNORM|POLLERR|POLLPRI;
|
||||
ret = POLLIN|POLLRDNORM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -597,10 +597,10 @@ static int devkmsg_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
|
|||
|
||||
mutex_init(&user->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
user->idx = log_first_idx;
|
||||
user->seq = log_first_seq;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
file->private_data = user;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue