RDS/IB: Rename byte_len to data_len to enhance readability
Of course len is in bytes. Calling it data_len hopefully indicates a little better what the variable is actually for. Signed-off-by: Andy Grover <andy.grover@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
92c330b9e9
commit
597ddd50e1
|
@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ struct rds_ib_ack_state {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static void rds_ib_process_recv(struct rds_connection *conn,
|
||||
struct rds_ib_recv_work *recv, u32 byte_len,
|
||||
struct rds_ib_recv_work *recv, u32 data_len,
|
||||
struct rds_ib_ack_state *state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rds_ib_connection *ic = conn->c_transport_data;
|
||||
|
@ -696,9 +696,9 @@ static void rds_ib_process_recv(struct rds_connection *conn,
|
|||
/* XXX shut down the connection if port 0,0 are seen? */
|
||||
|
||||
rdsdebug("ic %p ibinc %p recv %p byte len %u\n", ic, ibinc, recv,
|
||||
byte_len);
|
||||
data_len);
|
||||
|
||||
if (byte_len < sizeof(struct rds_header)) {
|
||||
if (data_len < sizeof(struct rds_header)) {
|
||||
rds_ib_conn_error(conn, "incoming message "
|
||||
"from %pI4 didn't inclue a "
|
||||
"header, disconnecting and "
|
||||
|
@ -706,9 +706,9 @@ static void rds_ib_process_recv(struct rds_connection *conn,
|
|||
&conn->c_faddr);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
byte_len -= sizeof(struct rds_header);
|
||||
data_len -= sizeof(struct rds_header);
|
||||
|
||||
ihdr = rds_ib_get_header(conn, recv, byte_len);
|
||||
ihdr = rds_ib_get_header(conn, recv, data_len);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Validate the checksum. */
|
||||
if (!rds_message_verify_checksum(ihdr)) {
|
||||
|
@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static void rds_ib_process_recv(struct rds_connection *conn,
|
|||
if (ihdr->h_credit)
|
||||
rds_ib_send_add_credits(conn, ihdr->h_credit);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ihdr->h_sport == 0 && ihdr->h_dport == 0 && byte_len == 0) {
|
||||
if (ihdr->h_sport == 0 && ihdr->h_dport == 0 && data_len == 0) {
|
||||
/* This is an ACK-only packet. The fact that it gets
|
||||
* special treatment here is that historically, ACKs
|
||||
* were rather special beasts.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue