From 567bb8fd47624cb9f894c64ce9530d43d5862a71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Mundt Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 14:25:39 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] sh: Fix up R0 dependence in __arch_swab16/32. There is nothing in these routines that inherently depends on R0 use. Given that these routines are inlined, it is rather easy to blow up the compiler by exhausting the spill class when performing a 64-bit swab. This presently manifests itself as the following: CC fs/ocfs2/suballoc.o fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function 'ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits': fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:638: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 2793 1230 1231 103 arch/sh/include/asm/swab.h:33 (set (reg:HI 853) (subreg:HI (reg:SI 149 macl) 2)) -1 (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 149 macl) (nil))) fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:638: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:1991 This patch switches over to using an arbitrarily assigned register instead. While the same issue does not exist in the SH-5 case, there is likewise no harm in having an alternate register used for the byterev/shari pair. Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt --- arch/sh/include/asm/swab.h | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/swab.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/swab.h index e69315935107..0e08fe54ad71 100644 --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/swab.h +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/swab.h @@ -14,15 +14,15 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ __u32 __arch_swab32(__u32 x) { __asm__( #ifdef __SH5__ - "byterev %0, %0\n\t" + "byterev %1, %0\n\t" "shari %0, 32, %0" #else - "swap.b %0, %0\n\t" + "swap.b %1, %0\n\t" "swap.w %0, %0\n\t" "swap.b %0, %0" #endif : "=r" (x) - : "0" (x)); + : "r" (x)); return x; } @@ -32,13 +32,13 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ __u16 __arch_swab16(__u16 x) { __asm__( #ifdef __SH5__ - "byterev %0, %0\n\t" + "byterev %1, %0\n\t" "shari %0, 32, %0" #else - "swap.b %0, %0" + "swap.b %1, %0" #endif : "=r" (x) - : "0" (x)); + : "r" (x)); return x; }