RDMA/rxe: Rename rxe_atomic_reply to atomic_reply
It's better to use the unified naming format. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705145212.12014-2-yangx.jy@fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
882736fb3b
commit
548c56dd2e
|
@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static struct resp_res *rxe_prepare_res(struct rxe_qp *qp,
|
|||
/* Guarantee atomicity of atomic operations at the machine level. */
|
||||
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(atomic_ops_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
static enum resp_states rxe_atomic_reply(struct rxe_qp *qp,
|
||||
static enum resp_states atomic_reply(struct rxe_qp *qp,
|
||||
struct rxe_pkt_info *pkt)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u64 *vaddr;
|
||||
|
@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ int rxe_responder(void *arg)
|
|||
state = read_reply(qp, pkt);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case RESPST_ATOMIC_REPLY:
|
||||
state = rxe_atomic_reply(qp, pkt);
|
||||
state = atomic_reply(qp, pkt);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case RESPST_ACKNOWLEDGE:
|
||||
state = acknowledge(qp, pkt);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue