mm: rmap: move the cache flushing to the correct place for hugetlb PMD sharing

The cache level flush will always be first when changing an existing
virtual–>physical mapping to a new value, since this allows us to
properly handle systems whose caches are strict and require a
virtual–>physical translation to exist for a virtual address.  So we
should move the cache flushing before huge_pmd_unshare().

As Muchun pointed out[1], now the architectures whose supporting hugetlb
PMD sharing have no cache flush issues in practice.  But I think we should
still follow the cache/TLB flushing rules when changing a valid virtual
address mapping in case of potential issues in future.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YmT%2F%2FhuUbFX+KHcy@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4f7ae6dfdc838ab71e1655188b657c032ff1f28f.1651056365.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Baolin Wang 2022-05-09 18:20:53 -07:00 committed by Andrew Morton
parent 3d0b95cd87
commit 54205e9c54
1 changed files with 22 additions and 18 deletions

View File

@ -1532,15 +1532,16 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* do this outside rmap routines.
*/
VM_BUG_ON(!(flags & TTU_RMAP_LOCKED));
/*
* huge_pmd_unshare may unmap an entire PMD page.
* There is no way of knowing exactly which PMDs may
* be cached for this mm, so we must flush them all.
* start/end were already adjusted above to cover this
* range.
*/
flush_cache_range(vma, range.start, range.end);
if (huge_pmd_unshare(mm, vma, &address, pvmw.pte)) {
/*
* huge_pmd_unshare unmapped an entire PMD
* page. There is no way of knowing exactly
* which PMDs may be cached for this mm, so
* we must flush them all. start/end were
* already adjusted above to cover this range.
*/
flush_cache_range(vma, range.start, range.end);
flush_tlb_range(vma, range.start, range.end);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(mm, range.start,
range.end);
@ -1557,13 +1558,14 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
break;
}
} else {
flush_cache_page(vma, address, pte_pfn(*pvmw.pte));
}
/*
* Nuke the page table entry. When having to clear
* PageAnonExclusive(), we always have to flush.
*/
flush_cache_page(vma, address, pte_pfn(*pvmw.pte));
if (should_defer_flush(mm, flags) && !anon_exclusive) {
/*
* We clear the PTE but do not flush so potentially
@ -1884,15 +1886,16 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* do this outside rmap routines.
*/
VM_BUG_ON(!(flags & TTU_RMAP_LOCKED));
/*
* huge_pmd_unshare may unmap an entire PMD page.
* There is no way of knowing exactly which PMDs may
* be cached for this mm, so we must flush them all.
* start/end were already adjusted above to cover this
* range.
*/
flush_cache_range(vma, range.start, range.end);
if (huge_pmd_unshare(mm, vma, &address, pvmw.pte)) {
/*
* huge_pmd_unshare unmapped an entire PMD
* page. There is no way of knowing exactly
* which PMDs may be cached for this mm, so
* we must flush them all. start/end were
* already adjusted above to cover this range.
*/
flush_cache_range(vma, range.start, range.end);
flush_tlb_range(vma, range.start, range.end);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(mm, range.start,
range.end);
@ -1909,10 +1912,11 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
break;
}
} else {
flush_cache_page(vma, address, pte_pfn(*pvmw.pte));
}
/* Nuke the page table entry. */
flush_cache_page(vma, address, pte_pfn(*pvmw.pte));
pteval = ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pvmw.pte);
/* Set the dirty flag on the folio now the pte is gone. */