XArray tests: Correct some 64-bit assumptions
The test-suite caught these two mistakes when compiled for 32-bit. I had only been running the test-suite in 64-bit mode. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
44a4a66b61
commit
5404a7f1c2
|
@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static noinline void check_multi_store(struct xarray *xa)
|
|||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
/* We can erase multiple values with a single store */
|
||||
xa_store_order(xa, 0, 63, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
xa_store_order(xa, 0, BITS_PER_LONG - 1, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
|
||||
|
||||
/* Even when the first slot is empty but the others aren't */
|
||||
|
@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ static noinline void check_store_range(struct xarray *xa)
|
|||
__check_store_range(xa, 4095 + i, 4095 + j);
|
||||
__check_store_range(xa, 4096 + i, 4096 + j);
|
||||
__check_store_range(xa, 123456 + i, 123456 + j);
|
||||
__check_store_range(xa, UINT_MAX + i, UINT_MAX + j);
|
||||
__check_store_range(xa, (1 << 24) + i, (1 << 24) + j);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue