drm/i915/guc: Clean up of register capture search
The comparison in the search for a matching register capture node was not the most readable. It was also assuming that a zero GuC id means invalid, which it does not. So remove one invalid term, one redundant term and re-format to keep each term on a single line, and only one term per line. Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230311063714.570389-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
9724ecdbb9
commit
53c4e64c6a
|
@ -1616,9 +1616,8 @@ void intel_guc_capture_get_matching_node(struct intel_gt *gt,
|
|||
list_for_each_entry_safe(n, ntmp, &guc->capture->outlist, link) {
|
||||
if (n->eng_inst == GUC_ID_TO_ENGINE_INSTANCE(ee->engine->guc_id) &&
|
||||
n->eng_class == GUC_ID_TO_ENGINE_CLASS(ee->engine->guc_id) &&
|
||||
n->guc_id && n->guc_id == ce->guc_id.id &&
|
||||
(n->lrca & CTX_GTT_ADDRESS_MASK) && (n->lrca & CTX_GTT_ADDRESS_MASK) ==
|
||||
(ce->lrc.lrca & CTX_GTT_ADDRESS_MASK)) {
|
||||
n->guc_id == ce->guc_id.id &&
|
||||
(n->lrca & CTX_GTT_ADDRESS_MASK) == (ce->lrc.lrca & CTX_GTT_ADDRESS_MASK)) {
|
||||
list_del(&n->link);
|
||||
ee->guc_capture_node = n;
|
||||
ee->guc_capture = guc->capture;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue