gpio: document polarity flag best practices
Document what we (Laurent and I, following a mailing list dicussion) believe are best practices for the polarity flag in a GPIO specifier. While touching the doc, I made a few minor editing changes to other areas. Suggested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3bde4d26f9
commit
51e8afc1c4
|
@ -13,11 +13,11 @@ properties, each containing a 'gpio-list':
|
|||
gpio-specifier : Array of #gpio-cells specifying specific gpio
|
||||
(controller specific)
|
||||
|
||||
GPIO properties should be named "[<name>-]gpios". Exact
|
||||
GPIO properties should be named "[<name>-]gpios". The exact
|
||||
meaning of each gpios property must be documented in the device tree
|
||||
binding for each device.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, the following could be used to describe gpios pins to use
|
||||
For example, the following could be used to describe GPIO pins used
|
||||
as chip select lines; with chip selects 0, 1 and 3 populated, and chip
|
||||
select 2 left empty:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -44,35 +44,79 @@ whether pin is open-drain and whether pin is logically inverted.
|
|||
Exact meaning of each specifier cell is controller specific, and must
|
||||
be documented in the device tree binding for the device.
|
||||
|
||||
Example of the node using GPIOs:
|
||||
Example of a node using GPIOs:
|
||||
|
||||
node {
|
||||
gpios = <&qe_pio_e 18 0>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
In this example gpio-specifier is "18 0" and encodes GPIO pin number,
|
||||
and empty GPIO flags as accepted by the "qe_pio_e" gpio-controller.
|
||||
and GPIO flags as accepted by the "qe_pio_e" gpio-controller.
|
||||
|
||||
1.1) GPIO specifier best practices
|
||||
----------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
A gpio-specifier should contain a flag indicating the GPIO polarity; active-
|
||||
high or active-low. If it does, the follow best practices should be followed:
|
||||
|
||||
The gpio-specifier's polarity flag should represent the physical level at the
|
||||
GPIO controller that achieves (or represents, for inputs) a logically asserted
|
||||
value at the device. The exact definition of logically asserted should be
|
||||
defined by the binding for the device. If the board inverts the signal between
|
||||
the GPIO controller and the device, then the gpio-specifier will represent the
|
||||
opposite physical level than the signal at the device's pin.
|
||||
|
||||
When the device's signal polarity is configurable, the binding for the
|
||||
device must either:
|
||||
|
||||
a) Define a single static polarity for the signal, with the expectation that
|
||||
any software using that binding would statically program the device to use
|
||||
that signal polarity.
|
||||
|
||||
The static choice of polarity may be either:
|
||||
|
||||
a1) (Preferred) Dictated by a binding-specific DT property.
|
||||
|
||||
or:
|
||||
|
||||
a2) Defined statically by the DT binding itself.
|
||||
|
||||
In particular, the polarity cannot be derived from the gpio-specifier, since
|
||||
that would prevent the DT from separately representing the two orthogonal
|
||||
concepts of configurable signal polarity in the device, and possible board-
|
||||
level signal inversion.
|
||||
|
||||
or:
|
||||
|
||||
b) Pick a single option for device signal polarity, and document this choice
|
||||
in the binding. The gpio-specifier should represent the polarity of the signal
|
||||
(at the GPIO controller) assuming that the device is configured for this
|
||||
particular signal polarity choice. If software chooses to program the device
|
||||
to generate or receive a signal of the opposite polarity, software will be
|
||||
responsible for correctly interpreting (inverting) the GPIO signal at the GPIO
|
||||
controller.
|
||||
|
||||
2) gpio-controller nodes
|
||||
------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Every GPIO controller node must both an empty "gpio-controller"
|
||||
property, and have #gpio-cells contain the size of the gpio-specifier.
|
||||
Every GPIO controller node must contain both an empty "gpio-controller"
|
||||
property, and a #gpio-cells integer property, which indicates the number of
|
||||
cells in a gpio-specifier.
|
||||
|
||||
Example of two SOC GPIO banks defined as gpio-controller nodes:
|
||||
|
||||
qe_pio_a: gpio-controller@1400 {
|
||||
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
||||
compatible = "fsl,qe-pario-bank-a", "fsl,qe-pario-bank";
|
||||
reg = <0x1400 0x18>;
|
||||
gpio-controller;
|
||||
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
qe_pio_e: gpio-controller@1460 {
|
||||
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
||||
compatible = "fsl,qe-pario-bank-e", "fsl,qe-pario-bank";
|
||||
reg = <0x1460 0x18>;
|
||||
gpio-controller;
|
||||
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
2.1) gpio- and pin-controller interaction
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue