drm/i915: Add ppgtt to GVT GEM context
Currently the guest couldn't boot up under GVT-g environment as the following call trace exists: [ 272.504762] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000100 [ 272.504834] Call Trace: [ 272.504852] execlists_context_pin+0x2b2/0x520 [i915] [ 272.504869] intel_gvt_scan_and_shadow_workload+0x50/0x4d0 [i915] [ 272.504887] intel_vgpu_create_workload+0x3e2/0x570 [i915] [ 272.504901] intel_vgpu_submit_execlist+0xc0/0x2a0 [i915] [ 272.504916] elsp_mmio_write+0xc7/0x130 [i915] [ 272.504930] intel_vgpu_mmio_reg_rw+0x24a/0x4c0 [i915] [ 272.504944] intel_vgpu_emulate_mmio_write+0xac/0x240 [i915] [ 272.504947] intel_vgpu_rw+0x22d/0x270 [kvmgt] [ 272.504949] intel_vgpu_write+0x164/0x1f0 [kvmgt] GVT GEM context is created by i915_gem_context_create_gvt() which doesn't allocate ppgtt. So GVT GEM context structure doesn't have a valid i915_hw_ppgtt. This patch create ppgtt table at GVT GEM context creation, then assign shadow ppgtt's root table address to this ppgtt when shadow ppgtt will be used on GPU. So GVT GEM context has valid ppgtt address. But note that this ppgtt only contain valid ppgtt root table address, the table entry in this ppgtt structure are invalid. Fixes:4a3d3f6785be("drm/i915: Match code to comment and enforce ppgtt for execlists") Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1539841231-3157-1-git-send-email-xiong.y.zhang@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
73f522bad1
commit
4f15665ccb
|
@ -334,6 +334,28 @@ static void release_shadow_wa_ctx(struct intel_shadow_wa_ctx *wa_ctx)
|
|||
i915_gem_object_put(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int set_context_ppgtt_from_shadow(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload,
|
||||
struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct intel_vgpu_mm *mm = workload->shadow_mm;
|
||||
struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt = ctx->ppgtt;
|
||||
int i = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (mm->type != INTEL_GVT_MM_PPGTT || !mm->ppgtt_mm.shadowed)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (mm->ppgtt_mm.root_entry_type == GTT_TYPE_PPGTT_ROOT_L4_ENTRY) {
|
||||
px_dma(&ppgtt->pml4) = mm->ppgtt_mm.shadow_pdps[0];
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < GVT_RING_CTX_NR_PDPS; i++) {
|
||||
px_dma(ppgtt->pdp.page_directory[i]) =
|
||||
mm->ppgtt_mm.shadow_pdps[i];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* intel_gvt_scan_and_shadow_workload - audit the workload by scanning and
|
||||
* shadow it as well, include ringbuffer,wa_ctx and ctx.
|
||||
|
@ -358,6 +380,12 @@ int intel_gvt_scan_and_shadow_workload(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
|
|||
if (workload->req)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = set_context_ppgtt_from_shadow(workload, shadow_ctx);
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
gvt_vgpu_err("workload shadow ppgtt isn't ready\n");
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* pin shadow context by gvt even the shadow context will be pinned
|
||||
* when i915 alloc request. That is because gvt will update the guest
|
||||
* context from shadow context when workload is completed, and at that
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ i915_gem_context_create_gvt(struct drm_device *dev)
|
|||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(ret);
|
||||
|
||||
ctx = __create_hw_context(to_i915(dev), NULL);
|
||||
ctx = i915_gem_create_context(to_i915(dev), NULL);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(ctx))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue