perf hists: Rename hist_entry__add_pair arguments
The current logic is to attach pair to the leader hist_entry. Arguments of hist_entry__add_pair function were placed the other way round.. driving me crazy. I.e. list_add_tail expects (new_node, head). Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1355404152-16523-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
367c53c08f
commit
4d23322a0b
|
@ -117,10 +117,10 @@ static inline struct hist_entry *hist_entry__next_pair(struct hist_entry *he)
|
|||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void hist_entry__add_pair(struct hist_entry *he,
|
||||
struct hist_entry *pair)
|
||||
static inline void hist_entry__add_pair(struct hist_entry *pair,
|
||||
struct hist_entry *he)
|
||||
{
|
||||
list_add_tail(&he->pairs.head, &pair->pairs.node);
|
||||
list_add_tail(&pair->pairs.node, &he->pairs.head);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
enum sort_mode {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue