spi/amba-pl022: Fix error case return statement.
The return -EINVAL appears to only make sense if the if branch that it is aligned with is taken, and the indentation indicates that this is the authors intent, so move it into that branch. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @r disable braces4@ position p1,p2; statement S1,S2; @@ ( if (...) { ... } | if (...) S1@p1 S2@p2 ) @script:python@ p1 << r.p1; p2 << r.p2; @@ if (p1[0].column == p2[0].column): cocci.print_main("branch",p1) cocci.print_secs("after",p2) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e447d3588e
commit
4a4fd47155
|
@ -1350,10 +1350,11 @@ static int verify_controller_parameters(struct pl022 *pl022,
|
|||
if ((chip_info->duplex !=
|
||||
SSP_MICROWIRE_CHANNEL_FULL_DUPLEX)
|
||||
&& (chip_info->duplex !=
|
||||
SSP_MICROWIRE_CHANNEL_HALF_DUPLEX))
|
||||
SSP_MICROWIRE_CHANNEL_HALF_DUPLEX)) {
|
||||
dev_err(chip_info->dev,
|
||||
"Microwire duplex mode is configured incorrectly\n");
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (chip_info->duplex != SSP_MICROWIRE_CHANNEL_FULL_DUPLEX)
|
||||
dev_err(chip_info->dev,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue