seccomp: don't use semaphore and wait_queue together
The main reason is to use new wake_up helpers that will be added in the following patches. But here are a few other reasons: * if we use two different ways, we always need to call them both. This patch fixes seccomp_notify_recv where we forgot to call wake_up_poll in the error path. * If we use one primitive, we can control how many waiters are woken up for each request. Our goal is to wake up just one that will handle a request. Right now, wake_up_poll can wake up one waiter and up(&match->notif->request) can wake up one more. Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com> Acked-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308073201.3102738-2-avagin@google.com Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fdf0eaf114
commit
4943b66df1
|
@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct seccomp_kaddfd {
|
|||
* @notifications: A list of struct seccomp_knotif elements.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct notification {
|
||||
struct semaphore request;
|
||||
atomic_t requests;
|
||||
u64 next_id;
|
||||
struct list_head notifications;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ static int seccomp_do_user_notification(int this_syscall,
|
|||
list_add_tail(&n.list, &match->notif->notifications);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&n.addfd);
|
||||
|
||||
up(&match->notif->request);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&match->notif->requests);
|
||||
wake_up_poll(&match->wqh, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -1450,6 +1450,37 @@ find_notification(struct seccomp_filter *filter, u64 id)
|
|||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int recv_wake_function(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned int mode, int sync,
|
||||
void *key)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Avoid a wakeup if event not interesting for us. */
|
||||
if (key && !(key_to_poll(key) & (EPOLLIN | EPOLLERR)))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, key);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int recv_wait_event(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
|
||||
{
|
||||
DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, recv_wake_function);
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_if_positive(&filter->notif->requests) >= 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
ret = prepare_to_wait_event(&filter->wqh, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_if_positive(&filter->notif->requests) >= 0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
schedule();
|
||||
}
|
||||
finish_wait(&filter->wqh, &wait);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static long seccomp_notify_recv(struct seccomp_filter *filter,
|
||||
void __user *buf)
|
||||
|
@ -1467,7 +1498,7 @@ static long seccomp_notify_recv(struct seccomp_filter *filter,
|
|||
|
||||
memset(&unotif, 0, sizeof(unotif));
|
||||
|
||||
ret = down_interruptible(&filter->notif->request);
|
||||
ret = recv_wait_event(filter);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1515,7 +1546,8 @@ out:
|
|||
if (should_sleep_killable(filter, knotif))
|
||||
complete(&knotif->ready);
|
||||
knotif->state = SECCOMP_NOTIFY_INIT;
|
||||
up(&filter->notif->request);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&filter->notif->requests);
|
||||
wake_up_poll(&filter->wqh, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&filter->notify_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1777,7 +1809,6 @@ static struct file *init_listener(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
|
|||
if (!filter->notif)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
sema_init(&filter->notif->request, 0);
|
||||
filter->notif->next_id = get_random_u64();
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&filter->notif->notifications);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue