powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: use kmem_cache instead of aligned stack allocations
Ian pointed out the use of __aligned(4096) caused rather large stack consumption in single_24x7_request(), so use the kmem_cache hv_page_cache (which we've already got set up for other allocations) insead of allocating locally. CC: Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com> Reported-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <dev@codyps.com> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf7588a085
commit
48bee8a6c9
|
@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static unsigned long single_24x7_request(u8 domain, u32 offset, u16 ix,
|
|||
u16 lpar, u64 *res,
|
||||
bool success_expected)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long ret;
|
||||
unsigned long ret = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* request_buffer and result_buffer are not required to be 4k aligned,
|
||||
|
@ -304,7 +304,27 @@ static unsigned long single_24x7_request(u8 domain, u32 offset, u16 ix,
|
|||
struct reqb {
|
||||
struct hv_24x7_request_buffer buf;
|
||||
struct hv_24x7_request req;
|
||||
} __packed __aligned(4096) request_buffer = {
|
||||
} __packed *request_buffer;
|
||||
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
struct hv_24x7_data_result_buffer buf;
|
||||
struct hv_24x7_result res;
|
||||
struct hv_24x7_result_element elem;
|
||||
__be64 result;
|
||||
} __packed *result_buffer;
|
||||
|
||||
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*request_buffer) > 4096);
|
||||
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*result_buffer) > 4096);
|
||||
|
||||
request_buffer = kmem_cache_zalloc(hv_page_cache, GFP_USER);
|
||||
if (!request_buffer)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
result_buffer = kmem_cache_zalloc(hv_page_cache, GFP_USER);
|
||||
if (!result_buffer)
|
||||
goto out_free_request_buffer;
|
||||
|
||||
*request_buffer = (struct reqb) {
|
||||
.buf = {
|
||||
.interface_version = HV_24X7_IF_VERSION_CURRENT,
|
||||
.num_requests = 1,
|
||||
|
@ -320,28 +340,27 @@ static unsigned long single_24x7_request(u8 domain, u32 offset, u16 ix,
|
|||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct resb {
|
||||
struct hv_24x7_data_result_buffer buf;
|
||||
struct hv_24x7_result res;
|
||||
struct hv_24x7_result_element elem;
|
||||
__be64 result;
|
||||
} __packed __aligned(4096) result_buffer = {};
|
||||
|
||||
ret = plpar_hcall_norets(H_GET_24X7_DATA,
|
||||
virt_to_phys(&request_buffer), sizeof(request_buffer),
|
||||
virt_to_phys(&result_buffer), sizeof(result_buffer));
|
||||
virt_to_phys(request_buffer), sizeof(*request_buffer),
|
||||
virt_to_phys(result_buffer), sizeof(*result_buffer));
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
if (success_expected)
|
||||
pr_err_ratelimited("hcall failed: %d %#x %#x %d => 0x%lx (%ld) detail=0x%x failing ix=%x\n",
|
||||
domain, offset, ix, lpar,
|
||||
ret, ret,
|
||||
result_buffer.buf.detailed_rc,
|
||||
result_buffer.buf.failing_request_ix);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
pr_err_ratelimited("hcall failed: %d %#x %#x %d => "
|
||||
"0x%lx (%ld) detail=0x%x failing ix=%x\n",
|
||||
domain, offset, ix, lpar, ret, ret,
|
||||
result_buffer->buf.detailed_rc,
|
||||
result_buffer->buf.failing_request_ix);
|
||||
goto out_free_result_buffer;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
*res = be64_to_cpu(result_buffer.result);
|
||||
*res = be64_to_cpu(result_buffer->result);
|
||||
|
||||
out_free_result_buffer:
|
||||
kfree(result_buffer);
|
||||
out_free_request_buffer:
|
||||
kfree(request_buffer);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue