cpufreq: x86: Make scaling_cur_freq behave more as expected
After commitf8475cef90
"x86: use common aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu() to calculate KHz using APERF/MPERF" the scaling_cur_freq policy attribute in sysfs only behaves as expected on x86 with APERF/MPERF registers available when it is read from at least twice in a row. The value returned by the first read may not be meaningful, because the computations in there use cached values from the previous iteration of aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() which may be stale. To prevent that from happening, modify arch_freq_get_on_cpu() to call aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() twice, with a short delay between these calls, if the previous invocation of aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() was too far back in the past (specifically, more that 1s ago). Also, as pointed out by Doug Smythies, aperf_delta is limited now and the multiplication of it by cpu_khz won't overflow, so simplify the s->khz computations too. Fixes:f8475cef90
"x86: use common aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu() to calculate KHz using APERF/MPERF" Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
520eccdfe1
commit
4815d3c56d
|
@ -8,20 +8,25 @@
|
|||
* This file is licensed under GPLv2.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/delay.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/ktime.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/math64.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/percpu.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/smp.h>
|
||||
|
||||
struct aperfmperf_sample {
|
||||
unsigned int khz;
|
||||
unsigned long jiffies;
|
||||
ktime_t time;
|
||||
u64 aperf;
|
||||
u64 mperf;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct aperfmperf_sample, samples);
|
||||
|
||||
#define APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS 10
|
||||
#define APERFMPERF_REFRESH_DELAY_MS 20
|
||||
#define APERFMPERF_STALE_THRESHOLD_MS 1000
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* aperfmperf_snapshot_khz()
|
||||
* On the current CPU, snapshot APERF, MPERF, and jiffies
|
||||
|
@ -33,9 +38,11 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy)
|
|||
u64 aperf, aperf_delta;
|
||||
u64 mperf, mperf_delta;
|
||||
struct aperfmperf_sample *s = this_cpu_ptr(&samples);
|
||||
ktime_t now = ktime_get();
|
||||
s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, s->time);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Don't bother re-computing within 10 ms */
|
||||
if (time_before(jiffies, s->jiffies + HZ/100))
|
||||
/* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */
|
||||
if (time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf);
|
||||
|
@ -51,22 +58,21 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy)
|
|||
if (mperf_delta == 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* if (cpu_khz * aperf_delta) fits into ULLONG_MAX, then
|
||||
* khz = (cpu_khz * aperf_delta) / mperf_delta
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (div64_u64(ULLONG_MAX, cpu_khz) > aperf_delta)
|
||||
s->khz = div64_u64((cpu_khz * aperf_delta), mperf_delta);
|
||||
else /* khz = aperf_delta / (mperf_delta / cpu_khz) */
|
||||
s->khz = div64_u64(aperf_delta,
|
||||
div64_u64(mperf_delta, cpu_khz));
|
||||
s->jiffies = jiffies;
|
||||
s->time = now;
|
||||
s->aperf = aperf;
|
||||
s->mperf = mperf;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the previous iteration was too long ago, discard it. */
|
||||
if (time_delta > APERFMPERF_STALE_THRESHOLD_MS)
|
||||
s->khz = 0;
|
||||
else
|
||||
s->khz = div64_u64((cpu_khz * aperf_delta), mperf_delta);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int khz;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cpu_khz)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -74,6 +80,12 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1);
|
||||
khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
|
||||
if (khz)
|
||||
return khz;
|
||||
|
||||
msleep(APERFMPERF_REFRESH_DELAY_MS);
|
||||
smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
return per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue