sched/fair: Fix the decision for load balance
[ Upstream commit 6d7e4782bcf549221b4ccfffec2cf4d1a473f1a3 ]
should_we_balance is called for the decision to do load-balancing.
When sched ticks invoke this function, only one CPU should return
true. However, in the current code, two CPUs can return true. The
following situation, where b means busy and i means idle, is an
example, because CPU 0 and CPU 2 return true.
[0, 1] [2, 3]
b b i b
This fix checks if there exists an idle CPU with busy sibling(s)
after looking for a CPU on an idle core. If some idle CPUs with busy
siblings are found, just the first one should do load-balancing.
Fixes: b1bfeab9b0
("sched/fair: Consider the idle state of the whole core for load balance")
Signed-off-by: Keisuke Nishimura <keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231031133821.1570861-1-keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
14204acc09
commit
47a3075109
|
@ -11121,12 +11121,16 @@ static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env)
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Are we the first idle CPU? */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Are we the first idle core in a non-SMT domain or higher,
|
||||
* or the first idle CPU in a SMT domain?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return cpu == env->dst_cpu;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (idle_smt == env->dst_cpu)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
/* Are we the first idle CPU with busy siblings? */
|
||||
if (idle_smt != -1)
|
||||
return idle_smt == env->dst_cpu;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Are we the first CPU of this group ? */
|
||||
return group_balance_cpu(sg) == env->dst_cpu;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue